Mark Huveneers;2502733; said:Didn't you think the date and the story was kind of relevant to post with the pics instead of getting everybody wound up!
reverse;2500440; said:They are not rare in their natural habitat, fact is they are considered a nuisance.
ewurm;2503465; said:I wouldn't say they are thriving either. They have enough challenges facing them that they are at least being looked at for Red red listing.
http://www.iucnredlist.org/search
ewurm;2503465; said:I wouldn't say they are thriving either. They have enough challenges facing them that they are at least being looked at for Red red listing.
http://www.iucnredlist.org/search
ewurm;2503465; said:I wouldn't say they are thriving either. They have enough challenges facing them that they are at least being looked at for Red red listing.
http://www.iucnredlist.org/search
ewurm;2503465; said:I wouldn't say they are thriving either. They have enough challenges facing them that they are at least being looked at for Red red listing.
http://www.iucnredlist.org/search
amazongirl;2504051; said:The Potamotrygons that are in the redlist are either Least Concern or Data Deficient. The house sparrow is listed as Least Concern- just because it has an entry in the redlist doesn't mean it's in trouble. Data Deficient means just that- they don't have enough information on it to assign it to any category.
Big Daves Rays;2503721; said:From what i've heard they are thriving. The dams have actually created some beneficial habitats for them with the sand deposits.