these pics look like bacteria bloom to me, but until a water perams are known, I agree any ones guess.of course something has to go wrong, things have been going fine with my tanks for awhile so its about time somethings wrong. I just posted the pics yesterday. the tank was clear before the water change. and after. and when I came home from work today this is what it looks like. the pictures make it look a lot clearer than it is. but the side view shows how you cannot see thru it! any ideas why??????
There are different kinds of beneficial bacteria are there not in an aquarium? If so then any excess of the three above will cause a bacteria bloom of the bacteria that eats the one that is in excess. Now I'm not an expert but just take a look at the facts here and who looks to have made the better deduction.bacteria bloom caused by ammonia, not nitrite or nitrate.
You've seen me around and I don't promote not changing water and my post doesn't suggest otherwise. As a matter of fact I do 2-3 water changes a week so why would I promote the opposite of what I apply to the hobby for myself? So why are you acting like I mentioned plants as being a replacement for water changes? If you read my post all I did was mention that algae while ugly has the benefit of eating nitrates. So how does that equate to me saying people don't need to do water changes if they use plants in their set-up? All it means(which is true) is that algae can be beneficial in helping a filter control nitrates.kolt, no offence, but the only way to remove nitrates is by water changes, you can never have enough plant life in a tank to do this. That would be the holy grail of fish keeping. water changes need to take place at or before 20ppm nitrate reading. DMG starts to occur at 25 ppm to a fishes internal organs. over time the fishes life is shortened and they croak early. if left high? HITH for oscars happen, and other cichlids. all the time the water is crystal clear.
I said it's the nitrates which are high while you said it was the ammonia; which according to the parameters posted I was correct. Which means if both of us are correct about it being a bacteria bloom then the bloom is response to the nitrates. Isn't that a logical deduction since the other parameters are within normal limits and there's different bacteria that consumes nitrites, ammonia and nitrates? Wouldn't it then be logical to assume the bacteria blooming is nitrate eating bacteria blooming because there's an excess of nitrates available to be consumed. No offense but it would seem you corrected me unnecessarily and incorrectly on many levels. One being cause I was actually right about the parameter that was off and two because you didn't read my post correctly and managed to take away from it something I did not say nor imply.Thanks, at 20ppm nitrates you need to do a water change, i personally would do a 80% or fin level, this bring nitrates down to around 8, easy on the feeding and check it again in 3 days. did you use test strips?
let me correct myself, there are systems for removing nitrate, but they are very high maintenance and expensive to run, and complex. at this time water changes cheapest, easiest way to remove nitrates in a fresh water tank.