What they had in mind was a limited government. They purposely left it vague.....I'm sorry but that's gotta be one of the most retarded things I've ever heard. Requiring a permit and annual inspection for owning a tiger is sacrificing liberty?!?!
Yeah I'm sure that's what the founding fathers had in mind when they wrote the constitution.
Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
You need to keep in mind that there is a never ending push towards banning exotics all together. It is giving up freedom when the gov't does not know where to stop. Take a look at the big constrictors, they are being regulated to complete bans but it is happening slowly. Same thing with big mammals or venomous.
Have you ever applied for a special species permit? Don't judge until you have tried.
Of course he hasnt. Nor has anybody else in this thread. The ONLY people who can truly comment on this world is those that live it. Sadly I do not have the extreme pleasure of living all of what I want, but I do get some and have pursued others. Heck here in PA, with the ridiculously horrible permit process we have, even if you fulfill the requirements they can still say no. Heck, thats whats going on right now. Even if you fulfill all the requirements, they still tell you no and wont give you a permit. The FACTS do not support the outrageous claims by some in this thread. The number of incidents in the private sector, you know what lets change that to % of incidents, is not some astronomical number. Is actually quite low. As I said in the very beginning of this thread, that movie is CRAP CRAP CRAP. Its BS, full of lies and exaggerations.
Conservation through commercialization