The journey continues...my rimless Aqua Forest

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
Great shots!
I love the last one and don't think the focus is bad at all.

I Googled the "70-200mm f/2.8" that is a HUGE lens and costly, what lens would you recommend for around $3-$400 for shooting tanks with my rebel XT.
~LiquiD~
 
If you don't already have an external flash, I'd see what you can get within your budget. A wireless flash in combination with an 18-55mm kit lens should be able to take pretty decent photos.
 
Liquidplants;4682205;4682205 said:
Great shots!
I love the last one and don't think the focus is bad at all.

I Googled the "70-200mm f/2.8" that is a HUGE lens and costly, what lens would you recommend for around $3-$400 for shooting tanks with my rebel XT.
~LiquiD~
Thanks! Yeah that is a pretty serious lens right there. I bought that lens when I sold my 400g acrylic setup :eek: A buddy of mine has the 55-200mm non VR lens (it's almost the size of the standard 18-55mm). And it's pretty awesome to compare the size/weight of those two lenses, even though they have the same zoom level.

But I agree with Burto, stick with the basic 18-55mm lens and invest in some speedlights. They will transform your photos. The main reason to get big pro lenses is speed; the big fixed apertures at all zoom levels give you great low-light shots. I use these lenses for general photography, they're not strictly for aquarium photography. Mine stays at a constant f/2.8 whether it's at 70mm or 200mm. The kit lens on the other hand, can only go as big as f/4 at 55mm and f/5.6 at 200mm (the aperture gets smaller as you zoom).

When shooting fish, you want three things in your settings:

1) very fast shutter speed to freeze the motion and avoid blur (1/125th or faster)
2) lowest ISO possible for highest image quality (100-200)
3) small apertures to get the fish in full detail and avoid blur (f/8 - f/16). I like using my zoom lens in order to achieve the cool background bokeh you see in my shots

If you try and shoot at these settings, even with a big pro lens, the result will be a pitch black image. This is because you do not have enough light. This is where the speedlights come in. They give you an intense blast of light over the tank resulting in an awesome picture.

Take a look at Greenterras's photos. I believe he's still using the basic kit lens with his Canon DSLR, but he's using wireless speedlights. His photos are some of the best on this site.

So in conclusion, if you have $3-400 to spend, I'd get 1 or 2 speedlights (some models cost 2x that of others).
 
Oh and here's my 70-200mm on my D90 :)

 
jcardona1;4682592;4682592 said:
Thanks! Yeah that is a pretty serious lens right there. I bought that lens when I sold my 400g acrylic setup :eek: A buddy of mine has the 55-200mm non VR lens (it's almost the size of the standard 18-55mm). And it's pretty awesome to compare the size/weight of those two lenses, even though they have the same zoom level.

But I agree with Burto, stick with the basic 18-55mm lens and invest in some speedlights. They will transform your photos. The main reason to get big pro lenses is speed; the big fixed apertures at all zoom levels give you great low-light shots. I use these lenses for general photography, they're not strictly for aquarium photography. Mine stays at a constant f/2.8 whether it's at 70mm or 200mm. The kit lens on the other hand, can only go as big as f/4 at 55mm and f/5.6 at 200mm (the aperture gets smaller as you zoom).

When shooting fish, you want three things in your settings:

1) very fast shutter speed to freeze the motion and avoid blur (1/125th or faster)
2) lowest ISO possible for highest image quality (100-200)
3) small apertures to get the fish in full detail and avoid blur (f/8 - f/16). I like using my zoom lens in order to achieve the cool background bokeh you see in my shots

If you try and shoot at these settings, even with a big pro lens, the result will be a pitch black image. This is because you do not have enough light. This is where the speedlights come in. They give you an intense blast of light over the tank resulting in an awesome picture.

Take a look at Greenterras's photos. I believe he's still using the basic kit lens with his Canon DSLR, but he's using wireless speedlights. His photos are some of the best on this site.

So in conclusion, if you have $3-400 to spend, I'd get 1 or 2 speedlights (some models cost 2x that of others).
Here's a nice size comparison ;)

(left to right)
Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VRII
Nikon 55-200mm f/3.5-5.6
Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8
Nikon 18-55mm f/2.5-5.6

_ND17709.jpg
 
Nice write up that helped a lot!

Below is my setup... shot with my DROID >.<

IMG_20101206_142821.jpg


IMG_20101206_142914.jpg


I believe that is a speed-light 430EX [B&H] I have NO idea how to use it, I just turn it on. [company camera Shhh]

I was also looking at This EF-S 60mm F/2.8 but I dunno how much better it'd shoot than the 18-55mm I have.

If I haven't made it clear yet I'm a Photography NOOB!
~LiquiD~
 
Ah nice, you already have a speedlight! What you'll want to do is get that speedlight off the camera and over the tank. To do this, you have two options:
1) hotshoe extension cable: easiest option, but limits the amount of movement you can do since you're connected to your flash

http://www.amazon.com/Off-Camera-Co...6IUK/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1291665328&sr=8-3


2) Radio triggers: I would go this route. This fires the flash via radio frequencies. I have this same set and the work amazingly well for the price. The name brand Pocket Wizards go for $200+, but these get the job done. The trigger goes on the camera, and the receiver goes on your speedlight. They have an excellent range and can even fire through walls and around corners, since it uses radio frequency.

http://www.amazon.com/CowboyStudio-...IXZW/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1291665328&sr=8-2
Put the flash over the tank and get some awesome pics!
 
images



:D
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com