LOL, I have no idea what you are talking about, Frank, and/or Jeff. I lied? Really? Ok fellas. This is not a derailment by me, this was me commenting about a forum that I am a member of. The discussion was on track, but apparently not the track that you wanted to see. Your comment above, Frank, seemed clear to me, you only wanted input on how this was going to work, for you, and others like minded. IMO, and IME, it would have never worked. But I didn't attempt to stop the discussion, positive or negative spin. That's the difference Frank.
And had some of the suggestions being put out there been implemented, it clearly would have involved censoring who could, and who could not take place in this behind the scenes room. Age limits, years of membership on MFK, is that not a form of censorship? You are restricting a certain segment of the membership from seeing/reading what would have been taking place in that folder. A folder that you gents were "brainstorming" about, that involved a different TOS from the rest of the membership here. Call it brainstorming, or whatever you like - this is what you were considering. I thought it was stupid, and not in the best interest of the forum. I'm just a single voice, so I'm not sure why everyone got so hyper defensive.
I am not implying anything, I'm only going by what has been posted - such as this started via PM, which implies more than just Frank. Did I miss something, guys? (plural)
Maybe this should have simply stayed in a PM? You chose to make it public, I chose to get involved. Underhanded approach? That's laughable, but most of what you post I can barely sort out, Jeff. Maybe that's the problem, it's all just a big misunderstanding, you think?
BTW - If you don't like what I have to say on a topic, feel free to place me on ignore. I have no problem with that, none whatsoever.
I could post the screen shots of the 1st few pages and prove how misleading you are being, I could pull quotes and so on. Honestly im really not interested in an ongoing argument. I'd rather the thread not get locked. The 1st few pages contrary to what you say was a normal convo. No arguing no censorship. Did you go read the 1st page or two ? No you didnt.
Honestly i dont want to see you embarrass yourself further. Ive always had respect for your contributions but i think i'll take your advice and for the 1st time use that ignore feature. Thx for the suggestion
Guys, the Mods already said no. So, it's a moot point to continue agruing. The only thing left is tension and hurt feelings. We already had 2 banned the last few days plus a few wanabes...let's not add to it.
There never was much of an arguement in the 1st place. I thought the 1st few pages were cool
Mods even getting in on the convo.
Mods please allow the thread to live theres probably still a decent discussion some where in here.
