Vote NOW!! What Geo you say this is?!!?

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
Yes they are Surinamensis. Ive had many of them over the years.. I love these guys.. They start to look very nice around 6-7inches!
 
AquataHolic420;687932; said:
No idea, nobody ever seems to know a damn thing about surinamensis, or Geo's all together. I got my fish from 3 stores. 7$-15$ each. and Dixon if theyre not Surinamensis, atleats leave me your guess on the species...Thanks


pics 1-5 may be altifrons.
not sure on the others they need growing out a bit more
 
Need to let them grow out they could be Geophagus abalios (1st choice) or Geophagus surinamensis (2nd choice)....
 
DiXoN;688273; said:
pics 1-5 may be altifrons.
not sure on the others they need growing out a bit more

At first I thought perhaps altifrons, given their wide range and many different-looking "morphs". But the lateral spot looks a little too large - if they grow out some and lose it then altifrons is the best bet. A tail photo will clear up if it is one of the Tapajos Red-heads. G. abalios may be a good guess but I've not seen many pics of them to know one way or the other. Can anyone point me in a direction to see some confirmed photos of abalios (i.e. not Fishbase)?

G. surinamensis is rare in the hobby mainly due to just about no exporting from the collection location. That doesn't mean they aren't in the hobby, just possibly misidentified or sold as just "geos". Any way we split it, we'll have to wait a while to get an exact ID for these pics. :)

J

J
 
My guess would be Altifrons.

99 percent of Geos that are labeled "surinamensis" are not at all. True suris are indeed quite difficult to come by.
 
EVERYONE, thanks for the reply, i really wanted to hear what you all thought about them. regardless i love them, and i will update you more and more.Thanks agian!
 
AquataHolic420,

I don't think they are surinamensis. I have been looking for true surinamensis for awhile as well. Anyway, they are good looking geos, so, enjoy them.
 
polomax24;688692; said:
AquataHolic420,

I don't think they are surinamensis. I have been looking for true surinamensis for awhile as well. Anyway, they are good looking geos, so, enjoy them.

Any guess?? or.....
 
We have some that look exactly like that, I will see what they have them labeled.
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com