Hum Varanus brevicaudaRed tail catking;1852602; said:Thats cool and all, but... whats the smallest varanid?![]()
Hum Varanus brevicaudaRed tail catking;1852602; said:Thats cool and all, but... whats the smallest varanid?![]()
CTU2fan;1852418; said:As for largest varanid in the pet trade that's up for debate. On the one hand the croc monitor (Varanus salvadorii) is reputed to be the longest monitor, even rivalling the Komodo in length. Not sure what the longest confirmed croc is though. On the other hand, an adult water monitor (Varanus salvator) while maybe not quite as long as the arboreal croc monitor will certainly be bigger/heavier. Sort of the same issues you have with the "biggest snake" debate...retic in length, green anaconda in weight.
He's right actully this thread was on the largest (bulky and heavy) reptiles. But don't feel to bad CTU2 and there is no reason for getting mad Ophiuch.Ophiuchus;1852704; said:Why on earth do people have such trouble with largest versus longest???
Largest usually implies mass, or in other words, space occupied. It doesn't matter how long it is. Thats why the Nile river is longer, but the Amazon river is larger in terms of sheer volume. Heck, there's some worm in the ocean that is reputably longer than a blue whale, but it's nowhere close to matching its mass.
There is no "debate."
Komodo dragons are larger than crocodile monitors in terms of weight and mass. Thats why I said so.
Green anacondas are larger than retics for the same reasons. Again...thats why I said so. I am perfectly aware that the longest snake is a retic and the longest lizard may be a salvator...but this topic was about the largest, not the longest, which is why I didnt even mention them.
The concept is not that hard.
[NOTE: I am aware that some keepers insist on powerfeeding their pythons and water monitors, thus making those two species come close to rivaling anacondas and komodos in size. However, I am not counting captive specimens, only what has been observed in the wild.]
Why do you said that?Red tail catking;1852663; said:You mean the University of Texas?![]()
coura;1852761; said:Why do you said that?
That was named exactly what you typed. Ophiuchus;1852704; said:Why on earth do people have such trouble with largest versus longest???
Largest usually implies mass, or in other words, space occupied. It doesn't matter how long it is. Thats why the Nile river is longer, but the Amazon river is larger in terms of sheer volume. Heck, there's some worm in the ocean that is reputably longer than a blue whale, but it's nowhere close to matching its mass.
There is no "debate."
Komodo dragons are larger than crocodile monitors in terms of weight and mass. Thats why I said so.
Green anacondas are larger than retics for the same reasons. Again...thats why I said so. I am perfectly aware that the longest snake is a retic and the longest lizard may be a salvator...but this topic was about the largest, not the longest, which is why I didnt even mention them.
The concept is not that hard.
[NOTE: I am aware that some keepers insist on powerfeeding their pythons and water monitors, thus making those two species come close to rivaling anacondas and komodos in size. However, I am not counting captive specimens, only what has been observed in the wild.]

Red tail catking;1852967; said:I don't no why he got so mad over that, mabye he's just having a sh**y day.![]()
