Back in the good old days, we used to agree on a lot of things, Frank. lol
Maybe because instead of there being 1 cranky old man.... now theres 2 lol
Unless someone is violating a law, or using anti-competitive practices, it's pretty much a free world out there when it comes to selling and buying. I buy online as well, but only because I am forced to. If it wasn't a 3-4 hour round trip I have a couple shops south of me that I would support 100%. I just don't think that one can use that as part of the argument. Online vendors have had an advantage from the get go.
Oh i totally agree. The competitive advantage wasnt the focal point of my argument just an unintended consequence if this were to happen. I wish i could purchase my fish locally. I forgot what its like to walk up to a tank and have your pick of the litter. The point is if i dont mind jumping through hoops and taking long drives to airports to pick up my fish what makes these guys assume there will be this huge drop in sales of fish like pacu ?
Theres a whole section on here of members that jump through the same hoops...and geez thats only the active posters.
Additional laws/regs always suck to start, and sometimes suck even more as time goes on. I miss some of my freedom from yesteryears, I won't deny that. But at the same time sometimes the only real option is change for the greater good. It's rarely perfect, but it's often better than doing nothing. I would be violating the TOS if I went in to detail here, but I'm sure some can understand what I am saying if they compare different nations, and some of their various laws.
This is the part where allot of us are split. These guys dont realize that at the present time there is no way legislation would get passed banning one business owner (lfs) from selling the same product another business owner (online sales) can sell. Who knows how long until im proven wrong but this isnt happening in an open free market system. I agree online sales kills lfs sales but to put that on paper in black and white as a regulation is absolutely an unfair competitive advantage. Trust me they arent going to touch that.
What they are asking for is gov regulation, point out how this is a bad idea and they cry about ideology or use the size and value of someones tank to decide that slapping an additional fee on that person is fair.
They want a permit or reg for large fish . When asked how large the fish nerds to be, who enforces it, who funds it, ect ect the reply is the agency or non profit will figure that out. One suggestion was 20 bucks as a permit fee. What happens when the next complaint is about fish that reach 12 inches... do we keep on going ?
Maybe it becomes wc fish too.
What happens when swami's 20$ fee turns into 50 or 60. Maybe we get a genius politician who says screw the yearly permit. Lets go with a smaller fee but place it on every fish sale of a certain size.
Now what happens with private sales. Do i need to make sure your permit is up to date ? How do i do this when you live on the other side of ththe country ? Who get in trouble if there is a forged permit ?
What about under the table/black market sales ? TOS...cant expand but this too had unintended consequences.
None of them have a remotely logic reply to these questions other than.... well really smart people will figure it out. Smh if i expand on this statement the thread will get nuked.
Sometimes just throwing crap at a problem just for the sake of feeling better about ourselves makes the problem even worse. Again cant expand...tos