So, some of you are equating how common or popular a fish is in the hobby, to whether or not it's overrated? Pretty interesting, really. I think oscars are among the most beautifully colored fish in the hobby... I don't care how common they are. I'm not a fan of hybrids, but even I would have to admit I like the occasional pic of a stunning red texas, and even saw a fader at a store recently that made my eyes pop! LOL...
Again... while I, myself, hesitate to call any fish "overrated"... I guess I choose my likes and dislikes by how the fish looks, and if it seems to fit my personality. Earlier, I said I just don't get the whole umbee craze. That said... I never kept one. To me, they just don't look that impressive. But if I ever kept one, could change my mind completely. I think I'll always have an oscar because I like their colors and puppy dog tendencies. I don't care if a million other people have 'em. I just like the fish. But I like a LOT of fish. I have one CA themed tank, one SA themed tank, one Malawi themed tank, and a saltwater tank... and I love ALL of my fish! LOL... so I guess I'm just undecided like that! LOL...
-Rich
I agree the rarity of a fish means nothing to me. All of the so called common fish would blow peoples mind if they were hard to get. They're taken granted of only because we see them all the time. If it was next to impossible to get an albino tiger oscar many would chunk out some large cash for it. I still absolutely love Jags and I always will. That's the one fish I have a hard time walking away from. I have no room for one right now but Id probably buy a new tank just for one if I wasn't so good at talking myself out of it.
