Why would you ask everyone to vote and post opinions, and then tell some that's giving their honest opinion - that they sound like they're 'trolling' ? IMO you invited ANY and ALL opinions, Yes? ? ?

Yellow_Perch;4946531; said:your not supposed to even get the pregnant ones but everyone keeps pregnant salmon for the eggs and then cure them for bait..
guitardude87;4946599; said:that's messed up. there is no law down here in florida that we can't keep pregnant fish (to my knowledge at least). But you can usually tell when the largemouth and peacocks are pregnant and if you are a considerate person and would like to see the next generation of largemouth and peacocks make it into the wild then you'd let them go but I have had friends (who are no longer my friends for the very reason you are about to read) who are literally brain dead and keep the fish just for bragging rights...they won't even eat them they would trade it to some guy at a tackle shop that would give them hooks, leaders, sinkers, etc. I tend not to keep freshwater fish. Saltwater fish I will keep and it's only a small enough quantity that would make two or three meals for two people
troutking;4948030; said:Is it just me or is rainbow trout not up there -_-.....i usually catch and release but dor trout i keep as many as my family can eat in one night. We usually have a big gathering if i catch enough. Like mentioned b4 i dont understand why people catch to freeze them when frozen fish pretty much tastes the same. One example i heard a guy would catch a bunch of lightnings to freeze for a whole year. Im thinking those trout wudnt taste to great after a while. Lol
troutking;4948030; said:Is it just me or is rainbow trout not up there -_-.....i usually catch and release but dor trout i keep as many as my family can eat in one night. We usually have a big gathering if i catch enough. Like mentioned b4 i dont understand why people catch to freeze them when frozen fish pretty much tastes the same. One example i heard a guy would catch a bunch of lightnings to freeze for a whole year. Im thinking those trout wudnt taste to great after a while. Lol
Alwayswantedadragon;4946593; said:Why would you ask everyone to vote and post opinions, and then tell some that's giving their honest opinion - that they sound like they're 'trolling' ? IMO you invited ANY and ALL opinions, Yes? ? ?![]()
im assuming you posted this to me? if so why would you post this then right a post a actual post thats just a opinion? i did say opinions are accepted but not what oscar had in mind? its off topic and not true.Alwayswantedadragon;4946593; said:Why would you ask everyone to vote and post opinions, and then tell some that's giving their honest opinion - that they sound like they're 'trolling' ? IMO you invited ANY and ALL opinions, Yes? ? ?![]()
Oscarum monstruoso;4948409; said:People who are in denial about their own wrongdoing are not open to opposing points of view. And if they are presented with facts that they cant accept, they'll just deny them and carry on. Just read how many people on this thread are claiming this bogus 98% survival rate for released fish. The truth doesnt interest them, they just want to feel right about the harm they do.[/QUOTE]
its not bogus its true that they do survive if you have water pass the gills which then helps keep circulation through the body but you dont just throw them back if it was a big fight with the fish you hold it there till its ready to go. but yea anyways if you just get the fish in fast you can throw it back..