selki;2733820; said:
It is not illegal due to it being an invasive species. its illegal due to the fact that its population is decreasing in the wild. Captive bred does not count towards the total population of wild.
if u all really love the asian aros and wishes for the ban to be lifted...id suggest you donate $$$ to CITES, who knows with enough donation just for the asian aros they could use it towards the revival of its endangered state.
Like I wrote earlier, I am not a fan of the asian aros personally.
So I'll let someone else take over this.
But the thing remains. If they are illegal due to a decreasing population in the wild and this ban is supposed to help stop the deterioration of their numbers in the wild, then why don't other countries impose this ban?
Here's what I'm talking about. The Brazilian government banned the exportation of plecos (I believe) and other fish so that the ban could preserve their numbers in the wild. So why don't asian countries where the asian aro originates from, impose such bans?
Next, what about other countries? Canada, for one, is allowed to keep them. Yet we don't know the status of the asian aros up there. What about those aros and do they originate as tank bred fish.
Now, if other countries are allowed to keep them, then the idea of the ban being imposed to preserve the wild population is contrary and rediculous.
All I'm saying is next time please provide a clear and cohesive argument, supported by facts taken from research.
I.E. make a bibliography include books and page numbers so that I can look this infornation up myself.