OK..... is there more than ONE photo of any fully mature carp on this site? We surely are making a lot of summary judgments based on a bunch of juvies.
looks escondido to me, because of the swiggle designs rather than pearls in face and gill platecichlidinsomniac;3858032; said:This one looks absolutely gorgeous though I'm not sure of the variant not even sure if its carpintes but it looks like it. I'm sure Jeff Rapps could shed light on it, it is from his site.![]()
x2caribemob;3858101; said:looks escondido to me, because of the swiggle designs rather than pearls in face and gill plate![]()
cchhcc;3857916; said:OK..... is there more than ONE photo of any fully mature carp on this site? We surely are making a lot of summary judgments based on a bunch of juvies.
Jimmy Side eye;3862147; said:Heres an intersting thread.... nowt about Vonts tho.
http://www.monsterfishkeepers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=293643
dogofwar;3873380; said:Carpinte varients are - of course - the same species.
The question is whether the different varients (or more correctly names of varients) are the same (i.e. from the same location / watershed) or different...
For example, "escondito" and "la chareil" are, for all intents and purposes, the same place (i.e. the same watershed with water that mixes)....and thus two names for the same fish. I'm really interested in knowing from where - geographic locations - the various varients come.
There is enough variability within a single population of fish...to say nothing of morphological changes that come from aquarium life (e.g. larger size, higher body, etc.)...and the variability of exposures of photography to make identification of one varient vs. another from online pictures based on morphological characteristics simply not reliable.
Matt
cchhcc;3873659; said:GREAT post. Especially the last paragraph. Far too many times we tend to take a limited population of an aquarium strain and make broad statements about them as fact.