I feel sorry for these kids
- Thread starter littlewangzfan
- Start date
Hypocritically speaking lets say there was only one gun, one shooter. Same guy holds the victims at gun point and robs them. The other two guys just watched, but came with the gunman/robber. Are you saying that only one of these three should be charged with armed robbery?
Mudslinger14;5131089; said:
CORRECT!! Ding ding ding. Likly though at trial they wont get convicted of it.
frnchjeep;5131159; said:
bingo
In this situation, the robbery was over. A car chase and a confrontation later, one man shot another man. That makes one man a murderer. It also makes the two men fighting with him accessories to murder.
However, hypothetically, lets say NO murder took place and it was just an armed robbery. One man robbed the victim, and the two others hung back, or even waited in the car. If the victim testified in court that the other two were present, but not involved, they would probably receive little to no repercussions, at least in comparison to the actual robber.
However, hypothetically, lets say NO murder took place and it was just an armed robbery. One man robbed the victim, and the two others hung back, or even waited in the car. If the victim testified in court that the other two were present, but not involved, they would probably receive little to no repercussions, at least in comparison to the actual robber.
Three are charged with murder, two will plead to accessorry to murder in return for testifying to the one who actually pulled the trigger. Two will get out in 15 years, and one will get out in 25 years. Four lifes were wasted over $600.00Mudslinger14;5131089; said:
frnchjeep;5131248; said:
So in your version of the hypo scenario, all three get charged with armed robbery as all were part of the crime. Only testimony would get them off? But in this case no victim testimony. All three need be charged with murder. If someone dies because of a crime you are committing you should be convicted of murder.
No....
If we are commiting a crime and u dont know I have a gun do u think u should be charged when I pop them? We werent commiting a violent crime, u didnt know I had a gun. We are both stealing wifi together and I shot someone for no reason, should u be charged with murder? We are both commiting a felony.
Posted on mobile.monsterfishkeepers.com
If we are commiting a crime and u dont know I have a gun do u think u should be charged when I pop them? We werent commiting a violent crime, u didnt know I had a gun. We are both stealing wifi together and I shot someone for no reason, should u be charged with murder? We are both commiting a felony.
Posted on mobile.monsterfishkeepers.com
Bderick67;5131317; said:
In this case, evidence trumps victim testimony, as there was only one shot fired. The other two did not make him pull the trigger, and they did not pull the trigger themselves. Evidence proves it, so a testimony isn't necessary. They aren't responsible for the murder. They are responsible for the robbery.
Since we are having so much fun with this hypo stuff, lets try this one. Lets say a fourth, unnamed, accomplice posted the add on craigslist, but wasn't present for the robbery. Do you think that he should also be charged with murder for putting everyone in that situation, even though he wasn't there?
God bless Amuurrica. What a dumb argument.
These kids are a complete waste of the oxygen we breath and they should rot in jail. The parents statements make them sound about as stand up as the children they attempted to raise.
Sad.
These kids are a complete waste of the oxygen we breath and they should rot in jail. The parents statements make them sound about as stand up as the children they attempted to raise.
Sad.
