They do not consider animals and humans to be equel in terms of value have no issues eating animal meat. Its more of a respect for all life
As a Buddhist, I approve this statement
They do not consider animals and humans to be equel in terms of value have no issues eating animal meat. Its more of a respect for all life
and I agree with that as well. respecting all forms of life is different then giving your life for all forms of lifeMy neighbors and very good friends are Buddhists great people, though they do not believe in harming an animal/insect/fish ect for no reason, they wont come fishing with us when we go catch/release but will if we are eating the fish. They do not consider animals and humans to be equel in terms of value have no issues eating animal meat. Its more of a respect for all life which i dont disagree with
oh so a child molesting menace would die but the leg humping dog is ok???
neither are all dogsTry not to take my statements out of context. First off none of my dogs are leg humpers, so it really wouldn't apply to the question I was asked. My point was not all humans are worthy of being saved.
you got why I wrote it. I was just trying to bring some light into a dark areaActually the leg humping dog thing I found funny. Unless of course animals and people are equal because then the dog is a sexual predator LOL.
poor guy is getting a life sentenceActually the leg humping dog thing I found funny. Unless of course animals and people are equal because then the dog is a sexual predator LOL.
With regards to the oil company and the ducks they broke the law fine. My concern is why did green peace take them to court not the government.