cichniss;1170798; said:IT IS A NORMAL JUVINILE TIGER OSCAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
As stated by modest man, all juvi oscars go through this coloration. Andyourblueblood, you say you work with fish everyday right, then why dont you know this???????????? Dude youve got an ordinary TIGER OSCAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Everyone who keeps saying this is an ordinary tiger aren't producing any photos to back this up. Just one crappy photo of an albino that looked nothing like the fish I posted. Like I've mentioned before, as prevalant as Oscars are (arguably the most popular cichlid in the hobby), pictures of their babies/juvies should be a dime a dozen. I'm just not finding any. I'm not saying I don't believe you guys or take you for your word, just show me. It's a pretty simple request.
I post a link to a Japanese site with an Oscar that looks nearly exactly like the fish I bought and everyone acts like I'm the retard. I don't understand.
Obviously, I assume it's because it's some species that no one has ever heard of, so that kind of makes it very unlikely that that's what I have. Well, that and the chances of getting a rarity like that from a Petsmart are probably pretty slim. But, even so, at the end of the day, I'm going to believe my eyes. No one else, so far, has produced one single picture of a "normal tiger oscar" that looks like the fish I bought.
And don't take this the wrong way, I'm not trying to be combative, or obtuse, or argumentative. I'm just trying to learn. I just think the unwillingness to accept anything besides the usual, rehashed, memorized same ol' same ol' profile type information is the downfall of mankind (well, maybe not that serious, lol.). After all, Convicts and Jack Dempseys were again re-classified. New species are being discovered each year. Isn't it even a little possible that one of these could've found it's way to a Petsmart in Concord, NC?
Maybe I am the retard in this discussion?




