the one in the picture is a vittatus, not a forskalli, I posted this above, currently according to the academy of scienece, forskalli is listed as a valid species and name, seperate from vittatus
fugupuff;4752390; said:the one in the picture is a vittatus, not a forskalli, I posted this above, currently according to the academy of scienece, forskalli is listed as a valid species and name, seperate from vittatus
fugupuff;4752390; said:the one in the picture is a vittatus, not a forskalli, I posted this above, currently according to the academy of scienece, forskalli is listed as a valid species and name, seperate from vittatus
jelly;4753301; said:A great link that might have some relevance in this thread
http://www.mbengasafaris.com/ have a look at the species link
I wouldn't be concerned about it not being a GATF. I have a 16" vatf in a 300+g and he looks huge. Has developed a great personality and snaps at the brycon every now and then.
jelly;4753301; said:A great link that might have some relevance in this thread
http://www.mbengasafaris.com/ have a look at the species link
I wouldn't be concerned about it not being a GATF. I have a 16" vatf in a 300+g and he looks huge. Has developed a great personality and snaps at the brycon every now and then.
fugupuff;4753512; said:great Link, thank you so much. I agree, vittatus is better colored, and easier to keep, I had one in the past that ate pellets from the surface. Unfortunately, many MFK members are not rational like you Jelly, they want the biggest and baddest, and goliaths always have a special place in my heart, its an incredible fish. If I had JohnPTC's tank, I'd fill it will tiger fish!
How big should this guy get?West1;4753811; said:Sweet, I was wrong
Jelly, post some pics of that Beast![]()
![]()