There are two differing subjects in this sentence here. DNA tests prove that EBJD's aren't hybrids. It is in the chromosomes of the nucleolus. It is DNA genes, which would prove that it is in fact a same-species fish. Unlike HIV, which is a blood test under a microscope... Sometimes people that make themselves looks stupid when they post just make me laugh.frnchjeep;2994449; said:Because if you go to the DR and get tested for HIV and it comes back negative, there is still a chance that you could have HIV. Odds are you don't, but tests can be and sometimes are wrong. Thats the same reason forensics dont hold up in court. Tests aren't proof of anything beyond probability.
. How don't forensics hold up in court? Forensics can be something like a video recording, a fingerprint, DNA, Gun shot residue, or someone arguing that DNA results don't prove which species something is.I<3fish;2998190; said:Sometimes people that make themselves looks stupid when they post just make me laugh.
I<3fish;2998190; said:DNA tests prove that EBJD's aren't hybrids. It is in the chromosomes of the nucleolus. It is DNA genes, which would prove that it is in fact a same-species fish.
i think that picture looks kinda screwyseamus;2996635; said:I've been breeding JBJDs (Jet Black JD)for years.... They are most certainly a different species than all other color morph JD's. Here is one of mine. I'm taking orders for the next batch.
![]()
Oh... and if anyone is wondering how I am so certain it's a different species, I used one of these:
![]()
maybe just me but do have any more pics? the eyes look weird and it almost looks like an edited negative of a normal jd but then again i am no expertColorado_Dempsey;2998665; said:i think that picture looks kinda screwymaybe just me but do have any more pics? the eyes look weird and it almost looks like an edited negative of a normal jd but then again i am no expert
So, now apparently people with faulty information are right?nc_nutcase;2998358; said:\
But if we were to look at it from a in the court of law type perspective you were wrong and the guy you criticized was right
But everyone makes mistakes, so no worries but next time remember that when you are criticizing others
I<3fish;3000914; said:So, now apparently people with faulty information are right?