It wont be long now!

[Miguel]

Ok, what's the point of all these silly links and stats. Do you really think you're gonna change JD's views, or anybody for that matter?

I believe that everyone is entitled to convey their opinion by the means they choose to, Jose.

None of us will change the other's opinion, obviously, but the discussion has its merits.

 

[HPIZZLE]

this man knows his weapon and obviously knows his child much more than any of us do. ultimatley its his decision as he is the parent of this child. i can see both sides of the argument and agree with both sides but in the end he will know what is best for his child, especially compared to people on a fish website looking at this photo.



P.S. JD, if you get a divorce i highly advise destroying that picture because it could easily be twisted against you in a custody case.

peace,

 

[JD7.62]

It is not illegal for a child to hold a gun. It is only illegal if she is in possession of the gun, in this case its all legal since JD owns the gun. Case closed. The apple doesn't fall far from the tree, in this case it never fell off.

Actually it depends on the state. In the state of Kentucky, there is no age limit for possession of a long gun. One must be 16 to posses a handgun but only while hunting, target shooting or en route to or from one of those activities. Over 18, no limits on possession. My CCW is not only for pistols either. It entitles me to carry what ever I want up to and including "weapons of mass destruction" and yes it says explicitly that in the statute.

 

[Miguel]

especially compared to people on a fish website looking at this photo.,

do you have an idea how many gun related discussions take place in this "fish website"???

 

[Madding]

It entitles me to carry what ever I want up to and including "weapons of mass destruction" and yes it says explicitly that in the statute.

Then the next picture had better be a shot of your daughter riding a stationary A-Bomb or I want my money back!

 

[Miguel]

It entitles me to carry what ever I want up to and including "weapons of mass destruction" and yes it says explicitly that in the statute.

You guys really are crazy over the pond!

How can that be possible??

 

[HPIZZLE]

do you have an idea how many gun related discussions take place in this "fish website"???

more than there should be lol.

You guys really are crazy over the pond!

How can that be possible??

prolly refers to dynamite or explosive chemicals more than anything.

 

[Madding]

You guys really are crazy over the pond!

How can that be possible??

The truth is that we're horrible at dancing and make up our shortcomings with both nuclear and chemical Armageddon.

 

[jcardona1]

do you have an idea how many gun related discussions take place in this "fish website"???

 

[carterhh]

got to start them off young