megalops///;3919045; said:I can't believe that so many people on this site are so sensitive and put fish on the same level as a human. It's a game fish for christ sake! Trust me, as an avid outdoors-man I have respect for the fish, but in this case I have much more for the angler. I'm jealous I didn't catch it. To each their their own.

Chaz88;3919296; said:Next thing. I am a hunter, fisherman, fish keeper and a member of PETA (People for the Eating of Tasty Animals)
megalops///;3919045; said:I can't believe that so many people on this site are so sensitive and put fish on the same level as a human. It's a game fish for christ sake! Trust me, as an avid outdoors-man I have respect for the fish, but in this case I have much more for the angler. I'm jealous I didn't catch it. To each their their own.
Nabbig2;3919513; said:Did people here equate that fish with a human being? Even if they did, that doesn't represent the views of all the people against the killing of this fish.
It has nothing to do with the morality of killing fish. This fish was 100 years old, that could have been kept in a public aquarium for others to view such a great creature, and would have also helped animal biologists so much. I understand the sport of fishing, and it was legal and his choice, but killing such an old animal was a douche move on that guy's part, especially when so many sturgeons are facing the possibility of extinction, and older specimens are becoming incredibly rare.