Bderick67;3602490; said:Ya I know what you said, that's why it was a BAD COMPARISON by you. I altered it so the comparison of the human height to fish length that you introduced would closer relate.
Again post your individual questions in the forums they belong, this way you don't have so much mis-information thrown your way.
how does that closer relate? and it wasn't the comparison that was important it was the point behind it. if we found an oscar tomorrow that grew to 22" in the wild by monday everyone would be telling me an oscar needs a 300 gallon tank cause he will DEFFINATLY get to 22" .. impossible for him not to. do you ge tthe point? if you don't notice that people do that? excellent thats your opinion. ive watched the threads for a year and everyone basically goes by the biggest size ever from that speices in history. i just disagree with how that is done so i ask for average size not max possible.
