Cyberman ........ I'm not too sure how I have been "talking down to you", IMO I've gone above & beyond in an attempt to explain to you why one cannot & should not make assumptions when attempting to identify the genetics of a fish, especially those that are closely related species, such as in this case.
You said;
Thats the point of this thread and to be honest I've still not satisfied myself that the fish I have are anything yet. To say my fish are Midevils is a easy answer, am I not correct? Its like saying I could be a cross between Scottish and English because you don't know....
It's not a case Midevils being an easy answer, it's a case of weighing in all the data that is available, and drawing a
reasonable conclusion based on a preponderance of the evidence. For fish that are sold at LFS, with no known provenance back to the wild, and where
common names are being assigned by the supplier and/or the vendor, then the only
reasonable conclusion is the fish should be considered of mixed origin.
Quite frankly I think that most
reasonable people would have by now read the two stickies in this section, and came to the same reasonable conclusion. The burden of proof becomes that of the supplier/vendor, not the consumer.
Mac - you said;
I think it is a fair assumption that unless you had a pair of f1's pulled directly from the water way in which they come there is no "real" way of identifying what they are exactly for 100%
First off, in the case of wild fish, and the fishkeeping hobby, they would be referred to as F0, the offspring of those wild fish would be considered F1's. Many wild labiatum have been brought in to the hobby over the past several years from highly reputable vendors such as Jeff Rapps, and many of those fishes offspring are also circulating within the hobby........
http://www.monsterfishkeepers.com/f...Rapps-photographic-library-of-wild-red-devils
as are many of his citrinellum........
http://www.monsterfishkeepers.com/f...s-photographic-library-of-wild-midas-cichlids
In the case of Cyberman's "red devils" (labiatum) it becomes an easier task to determine the genetics, if one knows the collection location as labiatum are only found in the great lakes. (Lake Managua and Lake Nicaragua) To the best of my knowledge they are also the only amph species found in the great lakes to have the physical traits that labiatum are known for - fleshy lips, elongated & laterally compressed bodies, etc. The Midas complex can be a bit more tricky, especially if you do not know the collection location.
The problem is that when dealing with most LFS, and almost all big box stores, your "red devils" are for the most part originating from a pond in Florida, or SE Asia, where in 99+% of the cases they will not be using wild stock as their breeding foundation.
So as you said, mac, there is no "real" way of identifying what they are exactly for 100%.
In that case, a
reasonable person, and a
responsible person that is breeding these type of fish (such as you are mac) will hopefully not sell the offspring, or if they do, will make sure that they are advertised for what they are. Which is where the term Midevil comes in to play.
That's the real point of this thread. Be responsible, and no one here gives a rats behind what anyone calls their fish.