zaric;5132275; said:Do you see this as defect![]()
Will never forget this pcs my dear brother
zaric;5132275; said:Do you see this as defect![]()
Twicksisted;5133895; said:As hobbyists and fishkeepers, we have a responsibility to care for and maintain our animals as naturally as possible for the best of the species.
This thread goes a lot deeper than "different people like different things". This is an animal that has a genetic deformity that could weaken its species if allowed to breed.
This isnt a fish with a missing barbel or a torn fin.
Nature dosent allow deformed and weaker animals to survive for a reason... Natures cruel but if left if left to do its thing, is brutally efficient. If deformed or inferior fish/animals breed, the offspring weaken the genetics of their species and this is not something to be encouraged by paying/charging high prices for.
Thats why its wrong on a scientific level, not a "Shame the poor little deformed fish" level.
T1KARMANN;5136406; said:Well TP stated that he paid king aro price for this tiger meaning he paid over $2.5k for it
That patchy tiger is not a deformity it's a very low grade fish that fisherman would normally throw back unless someone starts a crazy crazy like they did a few years back when everyone in Singapore was asking LFS to get patch ST
TP what you need to remember is MFK is not AF we are not all going to say nice pick up bro just because that's what you want to hear