If you actually bothered to read RTR's many other articles, you'd respect his opinion as I do, too.
http://www.**************.com/forum/library/author/rtr/
http://www.**************.com/forum/library/author/rtr/
kevinfleming21;5022072; said:mey masterB, how long did it take for your Mbu to reach this size? Mine is only about 6 inch ATM.
MasterB;5021959; said:Excuse my camera skills and scratches on the acrylic, it soon will be buffed out. He got a little fired up when I put the light on.![]()
RD.;5022183; said:I know exactly who RTR is, and I have read the vast majority of his articles on puffers, maybe even all of them. I didn't say that I had no respect for the man personally, or his vast experience with puffers.
But the reality is his personal experience with mbu is very limited, obviously, or he would have known that a 180 gallon tank wasn't going to cut it long term. So after he one day wakes he realizes that the answer is not a 180 gallon tank, but a 1,000 gallon tank, that is now echoed as puffer gospel for all times? Think about it.
To take a single isolated incident, of a mbu kept in a tank that was obviously going to be FAR too small once that fish began to mature, hardly equates to any type of hard data as to the min size of tank required to keep a mbu thriving in captivity long term. Both RTR & Stuart Morse clearly didn't understand this species long term requirements, but that doesn't mean that everyone & anyone else that attempts to keep a mbu in captivity is going to follow their lead, anymore than it requires 1,000 gallon system in order to fulfill this species needs.
Yes mbu puffers need a big ass tank, no one is arguing that point, but to pigeonhole this fish into 1,000 gallon minimum tank size is ridiculous.