haloman02;2709845; said:I don't know if you were serious or not but Flowerhorns are not Asian Cichlids.
They aren't????????
![]()
BigRun;2711042; said:Dogs are all the same species. Please stop using them as justification for breeding individual cichlid species together that would not normally mate in the wild.
mn_rebelTry tell these native fishes of Malaysia to see how they do well with Flowerhorn invasivion.
rory_068;2711727; said:mn_rebel
you poor missguided fool
this is a list of native malaysian fish
http://fish.mongabay.com/data/Malaysia.htm
you may notice thier are such species as
channa (snakeheades) known to be one of the most ferocious
killers in the deep
clarias catfish (walking catfish) again known to be a cold blooded killer
asian red tail catfish a nuther known killer
wallagoo attu (helicopter catfish) perhaps one of the largest catfish an adult would probably eat 20 full grown flowerhorns in one sitting
mangrove jacks mean as hell with a big set of canines
so you think flowerhorns will kill of all these bad boys?
wat about the other little fish you say wel if they can survive with the 1s i listed i dont think sum flowerhorns will cause much problem
flowerhorn in malaysia = fat ass snakeheads
cogs;2711101; said:great i don't own one but can't afford the ones i like, a beasty fish some look great and i lve the faders and red texas thats me tho
pug;2711562; said:Yes, true but all cichlids are perciformes and come from the same family of cichlidae. Unless your dog looks exactly like a wolf, then you have something that has been modified by man to be different than what is "wild." Once again, man molds his environment to suit his likes and dislikes, be it cichlid, dog, fruit, landscape, etc., etc.
pug
BigRun;2712225; said:Please note I am no expert on these matters but from what I understand, man molding a dog, would be the equivalent of say the Oscar in fishkeeping. Wild Oscars are rather bland and through selective breeding, we have developed "tiger", "red" "Platinum" "long finned" etc etc. (actually goldfish may be a better example of the range of genetic traits being developed.)
Just like we took the dog and bred certain traits to create the gamut of dogs, from Great Danes to pugs. Dogs, wolves, coyotes, and dingos are all subspecies and will hybridize in the wild without human interference.
I would say that the flowerhorn may be more akin to breeding a dog with a fox, which I am not sure is possible and is getting into a realm I am not comfortable debating.
Personally I would never keep Flowerhorns, some look very nice to me, some look vile and disgusting (The short bodied varieties) and some look so ridiculously red and "shiny" I keep looking for flashing lights hanging off their backs.
BigRun;2712225; said:Please note I am no expert on these matters but from what I understand, man molding a dog, would be the equivalent of say the Oscar in fishkeeping. Wild Oscars are rather bland and through selective breeding, we have developed "tiger", "red" "Platinum" "long finned" etc etc. (actually goldfish may be a better example of the range of genetic traits being developed.)
Just like we took the dog and bred certain traits to create the gamut of dogs, from Great Danes to pugs. Dogs, wolves, coyotes, and dingos are all subspecies and will hybridize in the wild without human interference.
I would say that the flowerhorn may be more akin to breeding a dog with a fox, which I am not sure is possible and is getting into a realm I am not comfortable debating.
Personally I would never keep Flowerhorns, some look very nice to me, some look vile and disgusting (The short bodied varieties) and some look so ridiculously red and "shiny" I keep looking for flashing lights hanging off their backs.