xspainx69;2500042; said:Absolutely not! If a vendor is not willing to come to some sort of a reasonable compromise nonetheless apologize for the inconvenience, then I would make this public and I would copy and paste the entire conversation on the forum so that there wont be anymore poor victims getting something they didnt order.
Its real easy to tell someone not to do this or that when your not the one who got jipped!
When it comes to "MONEY" its serious and it needs to be addressed. Obviously theres no consumers affairs report for MFK but the bottom line is if someone gets jipped then WE need to know about it! We are potential buyers and have a right to know whether or not there are scams occuring.
Again, there's NO WAY FOR THIS SITE TO DISCERN WHICH PARTY IS TELLING THE TRUTH. Therefore, no public airing of disputes. Also, as previously stated, PMs must be used for any discussions involving names of either the seller or buyer.
Finally, as it's been repeated many times before, all business transactions either on or off the internet are considered caveat emptor.

