I had a group of adult Rio Salto a few years back and they look much different than the pics I've seen of the Vontehillo. I found the Rio salto to resemble a Tamasopoensis in body shape. Like Mo says, more elongated looking.
the animal guy;3916175; said:oh my goodness. That is a beautifu fishl.. He looks stiff like a pitbull too. that's healthy.
Hey so now there's four locations of These? Are the four locations in Mexico? Is there anywhere else like a different country that have these? I just wanna know if those 4 locations are all connected.. Im not good with the map and I wanna learn more. Thanks.
cchhcc;3916771; said:Yes, all four collections points are, as you say, connected.....like as in the SAME watershed at the mouth of the SAME river.
baldtaxguy;3916795; said:I'm innocently asking this question, so keep your agendas in your back pocket. If you can't respond by picking someone's old scab, then don't.
With 4 collection points in the same river, and without any further analysis, are we most likely talking 4 different variants of carps? All 4 appear to have distinct visual characteristics. Can't those variants be identified and sold according to those collection points and corresponding distinct characteristics? Isn't the threshold for determining a distinct species dna analysis? And until then we have four nice looking variants that we, as hobbyists, would appreciate distinguished by suppliers for purposes of establishing our wish lists?
cchhcc;3915506; said:I agree. Dogofwar hit the nail on the head.
George, would you not expect to find slight differences in ANY species that you collect? I could go to my local pond and collect sunfish. If all the fish I collected came from one or two breeding beds near each other the fish would certainly have some similar characteristics. But those characteristics may not "exactly" match up to the sunfish on the other side of the pond. Is that a "new" race?
At the end of the day, any ichthyologist will tell you that splitting up fish based on slight variations in coloration (and these that are being discussed are verrrrry slight) is no basis for reclassification.
I'm surprised that the marketing angle gets dismissed so quickly. It seems there are races of common fish unique to just about every vendor.
Aquamojo;3917032; said:Actually that's not correct. The area where Laguna Chariel is located is huge...and I believe a more accurate statement is that the area is fed by many smaller rivers.
Don Conkel had said the collection point was north of Chariel. If you take a look at the map you can see a number of unnamed small bodies of water with very little connection to Chariel or L. Tortuga. It wouldn't be a stretch to have one of these with a local moniker. IN the map, Puebla Vieja is the bottom right, then above is Chariel, and above that to the left is Tortuga.
![]()
If you want a closer look at the area above. Do a Google map search for: Laguna Chairel, Veracruz-Llave, Mexico
Are they connected....sure. Many small streams and rivers flow back and forth. The real question is are they isolated? And that's pretty apparent. I'm certain fish cross back and forth, but depending on the difficulty and frequency it's very possible that small variations to the Carpinte theme can occur.
Here's the northern tip of Chariel with some small streams/rivers...connecting to another body of water (unnamed on the map BTW). What you can't see on this image is that just slightly north of this there is what appears to be a more marshy area connecting this to Tortuga. One of the thinks Don had said was that the fish was in slightly brackish water....quite possibly occurring in the marshy area.
![]()
Again...I am speculating based on the few facts that I have. Rusty is in Mexico now and said he was going to collect in that area with a friend. Perhaps he can fill in some of the blanks when he gets back.
Mo