Why Do We Have To Kill Another To Live? Serious.

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
Pesticides are another issue. They are entirely necessary especially in monoculture farms, but most of the ones currently being used are toxic in large amounts and over time. I read an article recently that had an interesting claim. It explained how many pesticides are systemic, both in plants and in mammalian bodies. Because food animals eat feeds that contain pesticides, they build up in their tissues. They claimed that some meat samples they examined had more pesticides per serving than vegetables. Some samples had several times more per serving

Hello; This was known some time ago particularly in top predators. Chemicals that do not break down easily move thru the food chain. A top predator (people can fit this label) consume large amounts of other organisms, both plant and animal, to grow and maintain over time.
Mercury in fish comes to mind. Lakes, ponds and seas are low spots in the gravity well and naturally become settlement spots for heavy materials. There are a few bodies of water near me posted with warnings about eating the fish.

Another recollection from the past. At one time it was estimated that up to 3000 new chemical formulations were being developed each year. Meaning chemical compounds created in labs that may never have existed in nature. Some of these wind up being put into the environment if they have a commercial application. There likely will be individual testing of the nature of the new chemical, but not so likely an investigation into how these various compounds might react once they get mixed in the environment.

R-12, aka Freon, also chlorinated fluorocarbon (sp) was perhaps the best referigant developed. Considered very inert. Took a while before a chemist worked out how the stuff would break down high in the atmosphere and deplete the ozone.

In a weak effort to wander back to food. Consider the amount of good land placed under a layer of asphalt or cement each year. A lot of the time land that is fairly level and good for farming is also the easier for buildings, roads and parking lots. It was many acres a year decades ago.
 
Skj147 you mentioned how much land is lost to urban development. Calgary the biggest city close to me seems to believe buying ffar land for houses is better than building the city higher. As you mentioned it seems the better the the more they want it the better for faring that is. Another thing that puzzles me is how developers love to build on flood plains. When you get right down to that is a real good way to pollute water during a flood. A few years back there was a huge spring rain during the melt and Calgary and surrounding communities were flooded.
I remember a reporter standing in a flooded parking lot in a town called High River, He reported that this should'nt be happening as this spot was a dry creek bed. When ever I think of that I really fear for the future of the human race. It appears as though we are on a mission to wipe ourselves out. Every other creature on the planet looks for ways to stay alive. Yet the so called smartest specis looks for to wipe itself out.
One thing has always puzzled me where did all of the Mercury that is polluting our waters come from. Is justleaching out of the soil naturally or did we believe this was a great place to dump it.
 
I knew coal was a dirty thing to burn but never would have dreamed mercury was emitted when it burned.
 
Skjl47 you don't have to say hello in every post, buddy. It's like joining for a conversation and saying hello every time you have something to say. :D

Okay that's rude, I'm sorry. You may continue.
 
The number one source of mercury in our bodies is not from food sources but from the mercury in our silver amalgam fillings in our teeth says a late 90's WHO study.


Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
 
The number one source of mercury in our bodies is not from food sources but from the mercury in our silver amalgam fillings in our teeth says a late 90's WHO study.


Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app

Hi; I have a dentist friend who rails against this. He thinks the mercury amalgam (sp) is safe. My plan is to have some other filling material if I need work in the future. I do not know enough to be sure one way or the other. I figgure having mercury in my mouth at least allows for the opportunity of some release. The stuff is supposed to be locked in the amalgam??
 
Hi; I have a dentist friend who rails against this. He thinks the mercury amalgam (sp) is safe. My plan is to have some other filling material if I need work in the future. I do not know enough to be sure one way or the other. I figgure having mercury in my mouth at least allows for the opportunity of some release. The stuff is supposed to be locked in the amalgam??
he says hi instead! :ROFL: ohhhh man I love this thread.
That's his signature. That's like telling you to stop playing funeral music and dimming the light when you post
Taker, stop, drop and roll.
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com