Madding;4815997; said:The truth is that we're horrible at dancing and make up our shortcomings with both nuclear and chemical Armageddon.
we do it driving, in these here partsMadding;4815997; said:The truth is that we're horrible at dancing and make up our shortcomings with both nuclear and chemical Armageddon.
we do it driving, in these here partsMiguel;4815900; said:Of course. I believe that no one disputes that.
The issue seems, at least to me, to be the pros and cons of educating the children on having those guns around them, as most in this discussion seem to think ( and I can understand that rationale ) and those, where I include myself, that think that that still is dangerous, because children will be children and, again, because familiarity can lead to disrespect of the rules and corner cuttings....
Too bad that they don't have stat in the same year, but may you tell us which stat is higher?jcardona1;4815523; said:What does it matter? It's THE LEADING CAUSE of child deaths in the USA. You like to play the stats game, but turn a blind eye when the stats go against your argument right?
In the United States during 2005, 1,335 children ages 14 years and younger died as occupants in motor vehicle crashes, and approximately 184,000 were injured. Thats an average of 4 deaths and 504 injuries each day.
Also, there is no suicide, homicide, legal intervention or inetent could not be determined with vehicle, so what's your thought, J?In 1999, 3,385 children and youth ages 0-19 years were killed with a gun. This includes homicides, suicides, and unintentional injuries.
This is equivalent to about 9 deaths per day, a figure commonly used by journalists.
The 3,385 firearms-related deaths for age group 0-19 years breaks down to:
- 214 unintentional
- 1,078 suicides
- 1,990 homicides
- 83 for which the intent could not be determined
- 20 due to legal intervention
Ah but your comparison is flawed. Car accidents are based on ages 0-14. Gun deaths on 0-19. We all know 15-19yr olds do not have the mind of a child anymore. I highly doubt the deaths in the 15-19yr category were accidental gun deaths. You and I know most of these are intentional MURDER. Slightly different scenario.jlnguyen74;4816173;4816173 said:Too bad that they don't have stat in the same year, but may you tell us which stat is higher?
Also, there is no suicide, homicide, legal intervention or inetent could not be determined with vehicle, so what's your thought, J?
The MFK whiners want this thread closed? Why? Like you said, It's just been a discussion. A little heated at times, but civilized at least.Gr8KarmaSF;4816381;4816381 said:Ummmm debated whether or not to close this, thus far no name calling, please report or PM me if there is a problem, havent read it all but seems like people are going to agree to disagree?
JD7.62;4815970; said:Actually it depends on the state. In the state of Kentucky, there is no age limit for possession of a long gun. One must be 16 to posses a handgun but only while hunting, target shooting or en route to or from one of those activities. Over 18, no limits on possession. My CCW is not only for pistols either. It entitles me to carry what ever I want up to and including "weapons of mass destruction" and yes it says explicitly that in the statute.![]()
ubehave;4815748; said:If I may interject I agree with Red Devil. Everyone thinks it's all cute with kids posing with guns until someone gets hurt.
![]()
, I can not believe that that 2-4 year old had a loaded firearm.chefjamesscott;4816450; said:Is this a for real vid?
I can not believe that someone else did not quote this.