Your thoughts on breeding BATMAN rays?

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo

BATMAN rays breeding?

  • Yes, lets learn more and see what happens!

    Votes: 85 57.0%
  • No, we dont need this in the ray industry!

    Votes: 48 32.2%
  • Depends on the offspring created....

    Votes: 16 10.7%

  • Total voters
    149
T1KARMANN;3459172; said:
probably talking out our AZZ but why take a avoidable risk

we talk about science, ..... isnt it science to find out excatly what it is caused by, if it is genetic, then it will be passed on to thier young and we will know FOR SURE, what causes it. Im not a scientist, as an engineer I always ask why and try and figure out why, rather then just ignoring the problem.
 
turkeyboy85;3459186; said:
we talk about science, ..... isnt it science to find out excatly what it is caused by, if it is genetic, then it will be passed on to thier young and we will know FOR SURE, what causes it. Im not a scientist, as an engineer I always ask why and try and figure out why, rather then just ignoring the problem.

if you are going to breed 3-4 genrations to see what happens then go for it

but if you get normal looking pups that means nothing and dont sell them as normal as they might have the defective batman gene which may pop back up in later breeding

you could have 100s of rays on the market with the defective gene which is not a good thing and who would be able to tell if the ray looks normal
 
TimTheBadass;3455073; said:
Are you seriously trying to deny that batman rays are deformed. If anyone is beating around the bush it's you.

You use dogs as an example. If you compare them to wolf's then yes they are seriously deformed. If you know anything about domestic dogs you would know that many breeds of dog have health issues like weak joints, breathing difficulties and so on. All of which are genetic. Domestic dogs have become acceptable. Personally I wouldn't like deformed rays to become acceptable.

Why do you hold koi and goldfish breeders in such high regard. They are in the same league as flowerhorn and parrot cichlid breeders. These are your real nazi's. They control the breeding of an animal to gain traits they believe are desirable. There's nothing NAZI about letting nature take it's course.

Do you seriously want a "freak" in the stingray hobby like flowerhorn's and parrot cichlids.

The name of this forum speaks for itself. The word MONSTER already tell us what kind of fish we like, and here we are discussing intolerance against what is freakish or deformed? By god. What Irony.

In the real world, I am 100% certain that in a poll of fish keepers & non fish keepers in any country, (Goldfish/Koi/parrot vs any of the more devilishly looking monsterfishes), The Koi/goldfish/parrot would come out as less freaky or deformed because they are mainstream.

The danger of surrounding yourself with a minority hobby with extreme taste, is that you fail to see the big picture. The simple truth is that Monster fish keeping is extreme and non mainstream. That is why we like it so much. But trying to impose your value system on the entire aquatic world is rude, intolerant and arrogant.

There is no way you could convince any cute pure bred dog owners or koi/LH/Gold fish breeders/hobbyist that their pets are deformed monstrous freaks compared to our dangerous looking ATFs, pacman cats or stingrays.

I preach a live and let live motto. I believe there is a place in the aquatic hobbyist world for all sorts. The only type of man made fish I am against are those involving cruelty, like injected dyes and fish surgery.

I personally don't support most dog breeds with inherent 'defects' like short life spans, breathing difficulties, bone problems. (I've done my research on that and an know of most defects of most breeds) I do so by not buying any of those breeds and adopting a mongrel.

But when I see an owner walking any of these breed, I don't go saying "Do you want freak like a bulldog in the dog world!" or "Deformed Mutt!" or any other ways of trying to forcing the 'truth' down the owner's throat.

I pat them. Say "Nice dog". Smile to the owner, and be on my merry way.
 
T1KARMANN;3459172; said:
probably talking out our AZZ but why take a avoidable risk



not going after ya buddy.... just wanna know if there is proof of this or if its all talk/theory....

i could have worded that better my bad
 
Perhaps we must agree to disagree? - lol
 
I think in relation to this forum the usage relates to LARGE SIZE, not the pathology definition that Lincoln wants to breed
:)

MONSTER:
n.
An imaginary or legendary creature, such as a centaur or Harpy, that combines parts from various animal or human forms.
A creature having a strange or frightening appearance.
An animal, a plant, or other organism having structural defects or deformities.
Pathology. A fetus or an infant that is grotesquely abnormal and usually not viable.
A very large animal, plant, or object.
One who inspires horror or disgust: a monster of selfishness.
adj.
Informal. Extremely large; monstrous: a monster hit at the box office; ate a monster steak.

[Middle English monstre, from Old French, from Latin mōnstrum, portent, monster, from monēre, to warn.]
 
Nic;3462972; said:
not going after ya buddy.... just wanna know if there is proof of this or if its all talk/theory....

i could have worded that better my bad

no offence taken i know how you post and you know how i post :naughty:

its just strange that we have 2 big threads going on right now 1 which is talking about interbreeding and how it can pass on defective genes and this thread that is trying to pass on a possible defective gene

i have no proof of any of my thoughts I'm a hobbyist not a scientist
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com