i'm glad you cleared that up for everyone with such an articulate retort. you have won me over with this irrefutable argument, i NOW get exactly what you're saying...knifegill;4458498; said:
SharonW;4454639; said:There's no way I'd eat it! Who made up the rule that bigger is better anyway? Why can't they just leave nature be
i'm glad you cleared that up for everyone with such an articulate retort. you have won me over with this irrefutable argument, i NOW get exactly what you're saying...![]()
knifegill;4459075; said:Okay, go eat a mutant, then.
If you have proof that eating corrupted DNA is so safe, show it. What has been done to these fish is not selective breeding within the confines of survivable adaptation, but the brute flicking of a switch not meant to be flicked. Are we eating excess growth hormone with the tissue? What amino components are left behind when this excess growth hormone is cooked?
ballinouttacntrol;4455536; said:Good read. My question though is since fish are growing larger in less time wouldn't it reduce the amount of feed that was needed? it basically helped eleviate the problem in your "corn to cow to jags to human consumption" scenario.