OK got ya, yeah he would have been cought. So yes we agree they did the right thing given the situation they were faced with.

jcardona1;4895826; said:So I'm supposed to pay 2x as much for my toilet paper because 4 guys lost their jobs?![]()
That's a good line but there already seemed to be a good number of people here who did not like the company before this incident took place.It happened at WalMart so it just fueled their fire.krichardson;4895863; said:That's a good line but there already seemed to be a good number of people here who did not like the company before this incident took place.It happened at WalMart so it just fueled their fire.
I don't love Walmart, it's just convenient for daily household items. They got everything I need at a good price. If I want nicer quality things, I'll go elsewhere. I always put it this way..komodo182;4895873;4895873 said:that would be the point of this thread. Those that dislike walmart will dislike it more, those that love walmart no matter what, will still like it.
Just passing on info. Do as you like with it
Plus MFK is always a good place for debates. When is there ever a thread that has no debating in it?
Clay;4895879; said:So, they DIDN'T do the right thing. I watched the interview they did on CNN yesterday. Catching shoplifters is their job, restraining them physically is not. And when someone brandishes a gun, you put the whole store at risk by attempting to disarm him. What if during the struggle, someone outside is shot? Walmart is right for firing them. They put the lives of everyone in the store in danger by not allowing him to flee. That is a job for the police, not Walmart shoplifter detailees. Who would be responsible if someone gets shot? W A L M A R T.
Some things that don't appear in the story here, but they explained in their interview:
The man was trying to leave the store and they brought him back to the room. They held him there after he tried to leave. At that point, he reached into his pants and they said they thought it was drugs. He pulled out a handgun and cocked it. They should NOT have held that person against their will. It is not acceptable for average joes to restrain someone. That is not their job. Remember, he brandished AFTER they touched him.
Oh, and don't think I'm ok with the criminal. I'm not taking his side. I'm saying it's dumb to restrain someone when it's outside of the boundaries of their job.
Thoughts?